<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He Forgot It in People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nazg.com/iqrai/index.php/2008/06/27/he-forgot-it-in-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nazg.com/iqrai/index.php/2008/06/27/he-forgot-it-in-people/</link>
	<description>Sliding down the banisters of the ivory tower.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dara Lind</title>
		<link>http://www.nazg.com/iqrai/index.php/2008/06/27/he-forgot-it-in-people/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>Dara Lind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nazg.com/iqrai/?p=124#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Urbanism can be cosmopolitan, or it can be localist. This depends on whether you see yourself as living in a state of urbanity or in a particular urbanity. It seems to me that most of the young D.C. intellectuals I know/read do the latter, which is much more localist than it is cosmopolitan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urbanism can be cosmopolitan, or it can be localist. This depends on whether you see yourself as living in a state of urbanity or in a particular urbanity. It seems to me that most of the young D.C. intellectuals I know/read do the latter, which is much more localist than it is cosmopolitan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Karras</title>
		<link>http://www.nazg.com/iqrai/index.php/2008/06/27/he-forgot-it-in-people/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola Karras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nazg.com/iqrai/?p=124#comment-664</guid>
		<description>It's important to distinguish between saying that "the idea-pushers don’t have to be everything they propose" and hypocrisy, though. If I make my living arguing that women shouldn't work, that's not vanguardy, it's just dumb.

I'm afraid that highly-educated, cosmopolitan 20-somethings arguing for localism and traditional community edges dangerously close to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to distinguish between saying that &#8220;the idea-pushers don’t have to be everything they propose&#8221; and hypocrisy, though. If I make my living arguing that women shouldn&#8217;t work, that&#8217;s not vanguardy, it&#8217;s just dumb.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid that highly-educated, cosmopolitan 20-somethings arguing for localism and traditional community edges dangerously close to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
